sci.electronics.components
Re: unijunction needed
>
>
> The PUT was much touted as being more stable and better for long delays
> than the old style 2-base unijunction.
>
> You stand a better chance of getting hold of a PUT these days - and if
> you can't, its easy to do the same thing with a complementary pair of
> transistors.
>
> The circuit is easier to design as well, while the old style unijunction
> has a set trigger point (subject to inevitable device tolerance) the PUT
> is basically a thyristor with the gate at the anode end instead of the
> cathode end.
>
> Basically you set the trigger point where you want it to be (within
> reason) by connecting the gate to a potential divider across the supply,
> the anode goes to the C/R as did the "emitter" of the old style
> unijunction.
>
> As the C charges up to the trigger point; the anode becomes positive wrt
> the gate and the PUT fires and develops a pulse across the cathode
> resistor.
Thanks for taking the effort to explain. I managed to download a bunch of
files explaining this sort of thing as well, but my main background is
chemistry, not electronics. I know what the words mean, but they don't
make much sense right now.
Maybe I'll get lucky and find out it was the tantalum capacitor that went
bad.
Alp
Written by alp soandso
18/10/2011 5.55.19
Check some pics on this site!
25/05/2012 19.46.11