David Lamb <dalamb_at_cs.queensu.ca> wrote:

> On 24/10/2011 11:58 AM, Keith Davies wrote:

>> ...so perhaps the easier

>> way would be to accept the framework as a given and fill from the bottom

>> up (get a slew of talents written, at least a couple of tiers) rather

>> than trying to get the talents completed.

>

> Seems plausible to me, but if you (or a commenter) happens to have a 

> good idea for the higher tiers of one specific talent, it seems 

> reasonable to include that.

I agree.  The intent here is to not push too hard looking for perfect

talents all the way up, but to have a minimum of two tiers.  If they can

go farther than that easily, of course I'd keep that information.  It

would likely be more subject to change than the lower tiers, but it

would be silly to throw it away simply because "I'm not doing that yet".

Keith

-- 

Keith Davies                      "I know, I'll explain this by waving

keith.davies_at_kjdavies.org          my hands vigorously!"

KJD-IMC: http://www.kjd-imc.org         -- greyooze

Echelon d20: http://www.echelond20.org