On 12/12/2011 06:33, C. E. White wrote:

> "WindsorFox<SS>"<windsor.fox.usenet_at_gmail.com>  wrote in message

> news:jbu4lc$5f0$1_at_posting2.glorb.com...

>> On 12/9/2011 10:28, NoOption5L_at_aol.com wrote:

>>> Been around since 1961, seems 2013 will be the end of the road.

>>>

>>> This 1977 model shows some of the bad taste that existed in the 70s.

>>>

>>> http://www.autoweek.com/article/20111208/CARNEWS/111209884

>>>

>>> Patrick

>>

>>

>>     Which sucks if the Transit is the only option. I have a 2011 E250 and

>> the Transit not only is just too small, I do NOT like how it sits lower to

>> the ground than a Mustang. At least it looks like it from in the 250 or my

>> Titan.

>

> Are you confusing the Transit van with the Transist Connect? The European

> Transit van is pretty big. They have not sold those in the US yet, so I

> don't know where you saw one. See:

> http://www.ford.co.uk/Commercialvehicles/Transit for a look at a Transit

> Van. See http://www.ford.co.uk/Commercialvehicles/TransitConnect for the

> Eurpoean Tranist Connect. In the UK Ford sells all sort of "vans," even a

> Fiest "van" (http://www.ford.co.uk/Commercialvehicles/FiestaVan).

>

> Ed

>

>

    Oh. Yeah that's different. I was basing that on the Connect already 

here. When I pulled up beside one in the E-250 I couldn't even see the 

driver it was so short.