In article <2p4nxxrcv5.fsf_at_bacon.lysator.liu.se>, krigsspel_at_pelle-n.net 

says...

> > Mr. Nilsson is right : asking $2 for what will be *perceived* as a

> > demo will not fly.

> 

> Also a matter of principle imo. A demo should be a free sample. It's

> part of their advertising. The publisher wants to convince me to buy

> their product. Or would it also make sense that I pay them $0.20 for

> looking at some screenshots too? Maybe charge me $1 for a 1-year license

> to even enter their online store?

The problem with free demos is that the limited - IE, crippled - version 

of the game often doesn't offer a fair evaluation of what the full 

version would be.

-- 

Giftzwerg

***

"'Occupy' is nothing short of a clumsy, poorly-expressed attempt at

anarchy, to the extent that the 'movement' - HAH! Some 'movement',

except if the word 'bowel' is attached - is anything more than an ugly

fashion statement by a bunch of iPhone, iPad wielding spoiled brats who

should stop getting in the way of working people and find jobs for

themselves."

                                     - Frank Miller