Tries to dismiss previous Findings of Fact as "prejudicial" (LOL):

[quote]

Today was the first day of the trial in Novell v. Microsoft, the

antitrust trial over WordPerfect and Quattro Pro. Novell won the right

to this trial on appeal.

....

   The main point of contention is how the findings would be announced.

   Microsoft didn't want the jurors to hear that the government was a

   party to the case as they believed it would be prejudicial. Microsoft

   also didn't want them referred to as "findings of fact".

....

In a previous case... Sigh. Well, *we're* not jurors, so here are those

Findings of Fact. for you, and if you read them, you'll probably

understand why Microsoft is so touchy about them. No one wants to reap

what they sow.

[/quote]

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20111017182502925

Here I was thinking Microsoft was keen to make sure people "Get The

Facts", but apparently that does not include the inconvenient facts

about its criminal behaviour.

Oh well, here we go again with another farcical antitrust trial, from

which Microsoft will walk away scot-free, because half the senate is

living in its pockets.

-- 

K.                           | "UNIX is basically a simple operating

http://slated.org            |  system, but you have to be a genius

Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on ??ky   |  to understand the simplicity"

kernel 2.6.31.5, up 149 days |     ~ Dennis Richie